BY MIKE METTLER
“Love is all around you.” It’s a phrase that enveloped me in full during the climax of The Beatles — LOVE. My reaction? “Yeah yeah yeah!” The 7:00 p.m. performance on January 10, 2014 was my fifth time seeing this Cirque du Soleil extravaganza in its 7 years (and counting) at The Mirage in Las Vegas. I was perfectly positioned in Section 200 in Row M, Seat 13, for what was going to unfold here, there, and everywhere around me. And you really do need to attend LOVE multiple times to absorb all of the many nuances of its sensory-overloading A/V spectacle.
LOVE is a visual tour de force — a hallmark of all Cirque productions — tracing The Beatles’ WWII roots alongside the idealism and eventual denouement of the ’60s up through the present day. The custom-built theater houses (yes) 6,000 speakers, all in service of a spectacular surround-sound mix supervised by original Beatles producer Sir George Martin and his son Giles Martin. Giles told Sound & Vision in 2009, “For LOVE, I took the material and layered it deliberately. When you extract and separate elements too much, quite often they don’t gel as well as they used to.”
There’s no better example of the proper gel than the carnival aesthetic of “Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!” threading beautifully with the low-end crunch of “I Want You (She’s So Heavy),” the abject fury of “Helter Skelter,” and the cacophonous, all-encompassing buildup and release of “A Day in the Life.” And the show-ending “All You Need Is Love,” seen at the very toppermost of this post, is a full-channel wonder awash with horns, harpsichord, harmonies, and peace-sign-flashing singalong exuberance.
While I could go on and on… I’m sorry, but it’s getting very near the end. To borrow a line from a certain Johnny Rhythm, I think they passed the audition.
Can’t get to Vegas to see LOVE anytime soon but still want to partake in the 50th anniversary of The Fab Four hitting the U.S. shores? (Hey, tomorrow never knows.…) Your next best bet is to check out The Beatles LOVE — All Together Now, A Documentary Film (on DVD or via download), which chronicles Cirque du Soleil’s journey to put forth such a massive show. Sir Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Sir George Martin, Yoko Ono Lennon, and Olivia Harrison are all on hand to give in-person input to Cirque founder Guy Laliberté and director/writer/show concept creator Dominic Champagne as the show is in its gestation stages (no pressure!). Notes Sir George of the audio, “We’re stretching the sounds, bending them.” Adds his son and co-producing partner Giles Martin, “If he [his dad] thinks it’s good, then it’s good.” And Sir Paul wryly observes, “What a f—ing great band we were.” (He ain’t wrong, you know.) Yeah, it’s quite f—-ing great, alright: the DTS 5.1 surround mix is beautiful and enveloping, and the panoramic views of the production and its presentation while it’s being worked through will totally knock you out. Sir George summarizes it just right: “Each generation as it grows up find The Beatles for itself. And it will go on.” Onward, one and all: Until you make the necessary pilgrimage to the Mirage, All Together Now is a fab, fab, fab way to Re-Meet The Beatles. A splendid time is guaranteed for all.
Bonus Tracks — He Said, He Said Department: Okay, consider this the “Her Majesty” portion of the proceedings. That is, here’s a few more bits from Giles Martin concerning his philosophy of surround sound and The Beatles: “Music in surround can be amazing, but it needs to be done the right way. It has its place — and it’s fantastic if you have the right speakers. As I said on my blog, “My proudest achievement with LOVE is that it made people listen again.”
“The original recordings were made beautifully, but quite often they were made for radio. We opened things up more for [Rock Band]. On the original of “I Want to Hold Your Hand,” for example, Ringo’s drums are rather quiet and the vocals are upfront because it was a radio track. We’d do a mix and actually play it in the game, and we’d find out that you can’t really hear the kick drum. So we’d go back and increase the dynamics on Ringo’s drums.”
“Of course, the sound does change with the venue. Take the rooftop concert. At first, it just didn’t feel right. So we put a slight slap on everything, because I thought it would sound like that if you were there; you’d get a slap off the surrounding buildings. With Shea Stadium, it’s a bigger space, obviously, so it has to sound bigger. It was important to us to have that attention to detail.”
Tags: A Day in the Life, All You Need Is Love, Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!, Cirque du Soleil, Dominic Champagne, George Harrison, George Martin, Giles Martin, Guy Laliberté, Helter Skelter, I Want You (She's So Heavy), John Lennon, LOVE, Olivia Harrison, Paul McCartney, Revolution, Ringo Starr, The Beatles, The Mirage, Yoko Ono
Mike,
I couldn’t agree more. The show was amazing and the sound was a feast for the ears. I also own the 5.1 mix and it is one of the better surround mixes in my collection.
I wonder what hard core Beatles fans think about the 5.1 version. I have most of the Beatles work on vinyl and love it but I know some purists need to hear everything in mono or stereo as it was intended. Not me but I’m wondering what your thoughts are.
thanks SoundBard!
Andrew
Thank YOU, Andrew. Well, let’s see… how much time do you have? Many Beatles purists (like my good friend Little Steven Van Zandt) swear by the Mono mixes as being definitive, since that was the band’s original recording intention before they got into stereo and experimenting with 4- and 8-track recording. Other fans who grew up on the stereo mixes have a hard time hearing them any other way. Some feel the 5.1 mixes are sacrilege, but my view is that, since a) they were directly supervised by original producer Sir George Martin and put together by his son Giles, b) the surviving Beatles approved them, and c) even George Harrison himself gave the Martins a template to work from and his blessing before they got underway, I’m very much ok with them. In fact, I often audition my surround-sound system for newbies with tracks from the LOVE 5.1 disc.
Most likely, the debate will continue on and on, especially amongst the audiophile cognoscenti who are still waiting for the ORIGINAL analog masters to be used for LP pressings, among other things…
MM
The SoundBard
MM,
Your response inspired me to re-listen to the LOVE 5.1 disc on my new Oppo BDP-105. Holy Sh$#@t. It really is a stunning sonic experience and a super-creative re-mix. I know you’re a Vinyl fan too. Is this something you recommend to pick up on vinyl too or was this project all about the 5.1 mix?
Hey Andrew,
What a coincidence — I have an Oppo BDP-105 too; what an amazing, benchmark Blu-ray player, to say the very least. And yes, you can indeed find LOVE on vinyl too, and I do recommend checking it out on wax for a fine analog comparison experience.
Incidentally, if you’re looking for some more great-sounding LPs to spin, I highly recommend David Crosby’s new solo album, Croz, as well as Mobile Fidelity’s handling of the early Bob Dylan catalog, especially Blonde on Blonde. And, coming soon, Benmont Tench (keyboardist for Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers) will be releasing his first-ever solo album , You Should Be So Lucky, on vinyl. It’s out on CD this week, but as Benmont himself personally told me, “vinyl is the truest way to hear this record.” Especially considering the album was produced and engineered by Glyn Johns and mastered for vinyl by Chris Bellman, I’d have to agree.
Happy listening!
MM
The SoundBard
I read you comments on the bands you feel are better than the Beatles. I do not know the criteria you used to pick your choices but the quality of the writing, the melodic nature and feel of the songs and the impact the music had on the music industry put The Beatles far ahead of almost any group.
I do not mean to be critical but unless you were considering only that these bands went in another direction and made a name for themselves, I think for the most part you are vastly missing how The Beatles changed music and inspired all that followed them. The Velvet Underground (Lou Reed was great and Walk on the Wild Side was incredible), U2 (very droning to say the least), Radiohead (no way), TP and the Heartbreakers (1st song Breakdown was good and different), Rush (good musicians but cannot stand Geddy Lee’s voice), The Clash (What?), Bruce Springsteen (good live show, but otherwise?) and The Replacements(completely baffled by this selection). Really, were you doing LSD when you wrote this article? Of the bands you picked only Lead Zep. The Band and The Stones could even come close.
If you were considering musical talent then you missed Cream, Jethro Tull, Kansas, Beck, Bogert and Appice, Steely Dan, CSNY and a few others. If you were judging on uniqueness and blazing their own direction and not compromising, yet maintaining tremendous musicianship, Frank Zappa would have to be on the list.
Anyway we all have our own feelings on this, as music is a very emotional and personal thing. Feel free to get back to me.
Best Wishes,
Bob Weaver
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your comments. The headline of that story was very deliberately framed as a question rather than a statement, and the premise was predicated on the idea that The Beatles set forth a template for all who followed them. Without The Fabs, we would have nothing.
It wasn’t an easy list to compile. I deeply love all of the other artists you suggested, as well as bands like Pink Floyd, The Who, The Doors… and so many more.
And I totally agree with you — music IS a very emotional and personal thing. And I’m quite glad to see music has touched your life as deeply as it has mine.
MM
The SoundBard
[…] totally agree. I’ve seen the LOVE show in Vegas five times, and […]